CHINA,
JAPAN:
EAST
CHINA SEA
DISPUTES ARISE AGAIN
Summary
Japan signaled on Feb. 22 that it may take a dispute with
China
over an
East China Sea gas
field to an international maritime court. Disputes between the
two countries over resources in the East China Sea have been
simmering for decades, and the latest warning by
Japan
may threaten China’s longstanding dominance over its
maritime territory.
Analysis

Japanese
Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano
(above image, left) said his country may go to an international
tribunal if
Beijing
begins producing natural gas in the disputed Chunxiao Gas Field.
Territory disputes over the East China Sea have existed for
decades, with Japan proposing to determine its territory through
the "median line" demarcation principle, and China insisting it
has rights to marine resources east of that proposed line.

China claims the Chunxiao Gas Field, located 4 kilometers (2.5
miles) inside the Chinese side of the Japan-proposed median
line, is squarely within its sovereignty, but Japan says the tap
of this field stretches into the disputed boundary. A 2008
principled consensus on the East China Sea reached by the two
countries ruled that both sides could share the potential gas
resource while leaving undecided the critical issues of the
exact demarcation line and exploration rights of existing
fields. The accord stemmed from the fact that Beijing had
already built a drilling platform over Chunxiao, and is now
ready to begin extraction.
Following a short period of eased tension after the agreement,
the issue was brought up again this year by Japan's newly
elected
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) government. On
Jan. 19, Japanese
Foreign Minister
Katsuya Okada, during the 4th Forum for East
Asia-Latin America Cooperation, warned that countermeasures
would be taken against China if Beijing explored the Chunxiao
field. Beijing responded by saying that China holds sovereign
rights to Chunxiao, but welcomed Japan to participate in the
development.
Tokyo's latest move demonstrates the government’s intention to
uphold its claim of sovereignty while holding a solid stake
against Beijing over a key area of geopolitical interest. This
despite claims by the DPJ that it is attempting to warm its
relations with China and other neighboring countries. This has
particularly been the case since support for the DPJ started
plummeting in the face of July elections for its
House of
Councillors.

However,
Tokyo’s
threats to appeal to the
International Tribunal for the Law
of the Sea may endanger Beijing’s longstanding
stance over its maritime territory, as the procedure may not
only subject Beijing to the international legal framework, but
also have a ripple effect that impacts China's disputed
territories with other countries.
Beijing has long claimed sovereignty over contested maritime
territories with several neighboring countries -- including
Japan, the Philippines,
Vietnam
and
Malaysia
-- for the purpose of both sovereignty and
abundant
natural resources. The evolution of China’s
rapid
economic development and international status over
the past several years has significantly accelerated the process
of China reasserting its authority.
Beijing’s strategy has been to claim territory through
preemptive
natural resource exploration projects -- as it did
in the East China Sea and previous joint venture projects with
the Philippines and Vietnam several years earlier -- or conduct
military activities in the
South China Sea,
without interference from international regulation, such as the
U.N. Convention on the Law of the Seas. It recently established
a Department of Boundary and Ocean Affairs under its foreign
ministry to enhance the capabilities and number of patrols over
claimed territory, and passed a law to better protect islands,
which drew close attention among those contesting territory.
The current threat from Japan, despite being a merely rhetorical
statement so far, may lead to a re-clarification of boundaries
by international organizations, and would greatly undermine
Beijing’s own strategy over its sea territory.
Copyright 2010 Stratfor.